Close Menu
Meteorological Technology International
  • News
    • A-E
      • Agriculture
      • Automated Weather Stations
      • Aviation
      • Climate Measurement
      • Data
      • Developing Countries
      • Digital Applications
      • Early Warning Systems
      • Extreme Weather
    • G-P
      • Hydrology
      • Lidar
      • Lightning Detection
      • New Appointments
      • Nowcasting
      • Numerical Weather Prediction
      • Polar Weather
    • R-S
      • Radar
      • Rainfall
      • Remote Sensing
      • Renewable Energy
      • Satellites
      • Solar
      • Space Weather
      • Supercomputers
    • T-Z
      • Training
      • Transport
      • Weather Instruments
      • Wind
      • World Meteorological Organization
      • Meteorological Technology World Expo
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    • January 2026
    • April 2025
    • January 2025
    • September 2024
    • April 2024
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Expo
LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook
  • Sign-up for Free Weekly E-Newsletter
  • Meet the Editors
  • Contact Us
  • Media Pack
LinkedIn Facebook
Subscribe
Meteorological Technology International
  • News
      • Agriculture
      • Automated Weather Stations
      • Aviation
      • Climate Measurement
      • Data
      • Developing Countries
      • Digital Applications
      • Early Warning Systems
      • Extreme Weather
      • Hydrology
      • Lidar
      • Lightning Detection
      • New Appointments
      • Nowcasting
      • Numerical Weather Prediction
      • Polar Weather
      • Radar
      • Rainfall
      • Remote Sensing
      • Renewable Energy
      • Satellites
      • Solar
      • Space Weather
      • Supercomputers
      • Training
      • Transport
      • Weather Instruments
      • Wind
      • World Meteorological Organization
      • Meteorological Technology World Expo
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    1. April 2026
    2. January 2026
    3. September 2025
    4. April 2025
    5. January 2025
    6. September 2024
    7. April 2024
    8. January 2024
    9. Archive Issues
    10. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    May 5, 2026

    In this Issue – April 2026

    By Web TeamMay 5, 2026
    Recent

    In this Issue – April 2026

    May 5, 2026

    In this Issue – January 2026

    November 27, 2025

    In this Issue – September 2025

    August 11, 2025
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Expo
Facebook LinkedIn
Subscribe
Meteorological Technology International
Climate Measurement

Control efforts see decline in US sulfur hexafluoride emissions

Dan SymondsBy Dan SymondsMarch 13, 20232 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
Credit - Pixabay
Share
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email

Analysis from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has shown that US emissions of the greenhouse gas sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) have declined between 2007 and 2018, likely to the mitigation efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the electric power industry.

At the same time, significant disparities that existed previously between NOAA’s estimates, which are based on atmospheric measurements, and EPA’s estimates, which are based on a combination of reported emissions and industrial activity, have narrowed following the establishment of the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.

Researchers from NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML), working with the EPA, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder (CIRES) and the University of Maryland, estimated US SF6 emissions for the first time from atmospheric measurements collected at a network of tall towers and aircraft in NOAA’s Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network.

The researchers provided an estimate of SF6 emissions independent from the EPA’s estimate, which is based on reported SF6 emissions for some industrial facilities and on estimated SF6 emissions for others.

Lei Hu, lead author and federal researcher in GML who was a CIRES scientist at the time of the study, said, “We observed differences between our atmospheric estimates and the EPA’s activity-based estimates. But by closely collaborating with the EPA, we were able to identify processes potentially responsible for a significant portion of this difference, highlighting ways to improve emission inventories and suggesting additional emission mitigation opportunities in the future.”

To view the findings published in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, click here.

Previous ArticleAustralian wildfires widened ozone hole by 10% in 2020
Next Article UK launches Earth Observation Climate Information Service

Read Similar Stories

Weather Instruments

R.M. Young Company reengineers SNOdar snow-depth sensor

May 21, 20262 Mins Read
Climate Measurement

Cloud measurement campaign targets improved climate model accuracy

May 20, 20263 Mins Read
Videos

VIDEO: Meteosat-12 imagery over Europe and Africa made available via YouTube streams

May 19, 20262 Mins Read
Latest News

R.M. Young Company reengineers SNOdar snow-depth sensor

May 21, 2026

SMILE mission launches to study Earth’s magnetic shield and space weather

May 20, 2026

Cloud measurement campaign targets improved climate model accuracy

May 20, 2026

Receive breaking stories and features in your inbox each week, for free


Enter your email address:


Supplier Spotlights
  • EWR Radar Systems
Getting in Touch
  • Contact Us / Advertise
  • Meet the Editors
  • Media Pack
  • Free Weekly E-Newsletter
Our Social Channels
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
© 2026 UKi Media & Events a division of UKIP Media & Events Ltd
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Notice and Takedown Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.