Meteorological Technology International
  • News
    • A-E
      • Agriculture
      • Automated Weather Stations
      • Aviation
      • Climate Measurement
      • Data
      • Developing Countries
      • Digital Applications
      • Early Warning Systems
      • Extreme Weather
    • G-P
      • Hydrology
      • Lidar
      • Lightning Detection
      • New Appointments
      • Nowcasting
      • Numerical Weather Prediction
      • Polar Weather
    • R-S
      • Radar
      • Rainfall
      • Remote Sensing
      • Renewable Energy
      • Satellites
      • Solar
      • Space Weather
      • Supercomputers
    • T-Z
      • Training
      • Transport
      • Weather Instruments
      • Wind
      • World Meteorological Organization
      • Meteorological Technology World Expo
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    • April 2025
    • January 2025
    • September 2024
    • April 2024
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Expo
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
  • Sign-up for Free Weekly E-Newsletter
  • Meet the Editors
  • Contact Us
  • Media Pack
LinkedIn Facebook
Subscribe
Meteorological Technology International
  • News
      • Agriculture
      • Automated Weather Stations
      • Aviation
      • Climate Measurement
      • Data
      • Developing Countries
      • Digital Applications
      • Early Warning Systems
      • Extreme Weather
      • Hydrology
      • Lidar
      • Lightning Detection
      • New Appointments
      • Nowcasting
      • Numerical Weather Prediction
      • Polar Weather
      • Radar
      • Rainfall
      • Remote Sensing
      • Renewable Energy
      • Satellites
      • Solar
      • Space Weather
      • Supercomputers
      • Training
      • Transport
      • Weather Instruments
      • Wind
      • World Meteorological Organization
      • Meteorological Technology World Expo
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    1. April 2025
    2. January 2025
    3. September 2024
    4. April 2024
    5. January 2024
    6. September 2023
    7. April 2023
    8. Archive Issues
    9. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    April 15, 2025

    In this Issue – April 2025

    By Web TeamApril 15, 2025
    Recent

    In this Issue – April 2025

    April 15, 2025

    In this Issue – January 2025

    December 13, 2024

    In this Issue – September 2024

    August 8, 2024
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Expo
Facebook LinkedIn
Subscribe
Meteorological Technology International
Opinion

Improving convective precipitation modeling for climate prediction

Tobias Becker, Peter Bechtold, Irina SanduBy Tobias Becker, Peter Bechtold, Irina SanduNovember 20, 20197 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
Share
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email

Experts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) look at recent work that has been carried out to improve on some of the longstanding errors in convective precipitation.

Article by: Tobias Becker, postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology and visiting scientist at ECMWF; Peter Bechtold, principal scientist at ECMWF’s Physical Processes team; and Irina Sandu, ECMWF Physical Processes team leader

Human life depends on the accessibility of water in many ways, and is thus vulnerable to changes in the global water cycle. Global climate projections foresee that a warming climate will lead to less frequent precipitation events, increasing the likelihood of droughts and making precipitation more extreme when it does fall. In this context, it is becoming more pressing than ever to make better predictions of the global water cycle, and in particular of precipitation.

Precipitation can be generated by large-scale, typically frontal processes and by convection which occurs at smaller scales. Simulating the processes of convection remains a challenge for numerical weather prediction and climate models.

The challenges of modelling convective precipitation

Even though the representation of convection in numerical models has improved considerably in recent decades, convective precipitation still remains the most relevant cause of systematic errors in weather and climate models, according to a recent survey among global modelling centers.

Convection is complex and hard to model because it involves multiple processes, many of which take place at scales smaller than the model’s grid cell, so they need to be parametrized. The assumptions that have to be made when parametrizing convection explain many of the systematic errors in convective precipitation.

Climate projections and global weather forecasts at convective storm-resolving resolutions (2-4km), in which deep convective systems are at least partially resolved, are now becoming feasible and they provide a real opportunity to understand and improve on some of the longstanding errors in convective precipitation. Indeed, ECMWF aims to perform the first ensemble global weather forecasts in the world at a horizontal resolution of about 4-5 km by 2025.

During Becker’s three-month visit in the Physical Processes team at ECMWF in spring 2019, we demonstrated that such simulations do offer exciting possibilities to reduce some of the most persistent systematic biases in convective precipitation. We performed a first systematic comparison of global 4km resolution forecasts executed with and without parametrized deep convection with ECMWF’s Integrated Forecasting System (IFS).

Limitations of today’s convective parametrizations

Most systematic errors in convective precipitation arise from necessary assumptions in the convective parametrizations concerning:

  • Triggering of convection.
  • Mixing of the convective plumes with the environment.
  • Estimation of the overall intensity of the convection as a function of the convective instability that arises from the large-scale lifting and the surface heating.

We focused our analysis of the IFS forecasts on tropical Africa, a region where large and long-lived squall lines form in late summer and the shortcomings of convective parametrizations become particularly obvious. We found that when the deep convection parametrization is used, the biases of the 4km forecasts resemble those of ECMWF’s 9km operational forecasts. Thus, precipitation is triggered too early and not maintained for long enough, mesoscale convective systems are too stationary and sometimes even propagate against the easterly low-level flow, contrary to what is observed.

Figure 1: An example of mesoscale convective systems over tropical Africa 

These systematic errors can be linked to the lack of memory in the parametrizations and an inadequate representation of the interaction between the convective-scale and large-scale flow. In contrast, when the deep convection parametrization is switched off (the “explicit” experiments discussed below), the mesoscale convective systems do propagate in a more realistic manner, but their intensity is overestimated compared to available rainfall data and convection becomes too localized, particularly over the tropical oceans.

Exciting prospects for modelling convection

We are now exploring how these remaining errors in convective precipitation at 4km resolution relate to interactions of deep convection with its environment.

Improving the inhibition of convection after a rain event

We have demonstrated, for example, that the lack of lower tropospheric drying, locally caused by convection-induced subsidence, together with too weak surface moistening and evaporative cooling, explains why the convective inhibition (CIN) after a rain event does not increase in the case of parametrized convection.

This is illustrated in Figure 2, where we have plotted the CIN before (solid lines) and after (dotted lines) rain events of given intensity from a large sample of intense mesoscale convective systems over tropical Africa during August 2016. In the parametrized run (orange lines) the CIN barely varies, while in the explicit runs (green lines) the CIN after a rain event increases markedly as a function of rain intensity, helping to move (favor) the convection in the direction of the flow.

Figure 2: Convective inhibition (CIN) versus precipitation intensity (mm/day) in 4km resolution IFS forecasts with parametrized (normal) and without parametrized (explicit) deep convection. Solid and dashed lines refer to before and after a 3-hour rain event. Results are shown for tropical Africa, with 24 to 48 hours lead time of daily forecasts for August 2016. The baseline convection run is denoted as “normal” and the experimental version as “q advec” for total moisture advection

This inspired changes to the convection parametrization that aim to address this weakness, by including the total advection of moisture explicitly in the convective closure. This produced a marked increase of CIN after a rain event (purple lines in Figure 2). The CIN also increases with rain intensity as the convective induced subsidence and rain evaporation increases with increased convective activity (rainfall).

Improved westward propagation of tropical African convection

We have also examined the propagation of tropical African convective systems. While in the baseline parametrized run the convective systems are quasi-stationary and their intensity is about half that of the explicit run, in the experimental runs using the total moisture advection in the closure, there is a clear westward propagation which can also be verified visually on the rainfall and cloud fields (not shown).

We also examined the overall global energetic signature of convection with the aid of global kinetic energy spectra as a function of the total wavenumber. As the effect of convective heating and divergent convective outflow maximizes in the upper troposphere, we show in Figure 3 kinetic energy spectra at 200 hPa. For better comparison we have also added the energy spectra for an explicit hydrostatic simulation at 2.5km horizontal resolution and a non-hydrostatic explicit simulation at 1km with the ECMWF IFS as provided by Nils Wedi.

Figure 3: Kinetic energy spectra as a function of the total wavenumber for the 4 km baseline run with (normal, orange) and without parametrized convection (explicit, green), the experimental version with revised deep convection (q advec, purple), as well as a hydrostatic explicit simulation at 2.5 km (cyan) and a non-hydrostatic simulation at 1 km (red) as provided by Nils Wedi

Comparing the explicit (green) and baseline (orange) parametrized 4km runs, we notice for wavenumbers >100, that is for scales <200–300km, a much higher kinetic energy in the explicit simulation of up to a factor of three (note the log scale).

However, comparing all the explicit simulations at resolutions of 4, 2.5 and 1km, we see that the kinetic energy in the mesoscales actually decreases with increasing model resolution. Assuming that convective mixing becomes better resolved with increasing resolution, we conclude that the explicit 4km run strongly overestimates the kinetic energy (and the convective activity which is independently verified with the aid of precipitation data). The overall encouraging result in Figure 3 is that if we take the 1km explicit run (red) as a benchmark, the 4km simulation with the revised convection parametrization (purple) is more active than the baseline simulation and the spectra closely follow the benchmark 1km simulation for scales >20-40km. Note that only scales of 4-8 times the grid resolution can be resolved.

This leaves us with more encouraging work to do for the future 4km resolution update, likely mitigating features of parametrized and explicit convective overturning. New observational field campaigns like the recent OTREC campaign will also be helpful to improve the representation of organized convection (Figure 4).

Figure 4: The OTREC field campaign is helping to gather detailed observations of tropical convection. The photo shows Peter Bechtold (left) and Zeljka Fuchs (principal investigator of OTREC)

This article is courtesy of ECMWF.

Previous ArticleDemocratizing the world’s weather data with IBM GRAF
Next Article After decades of slowing down, global windspeeds are picking up

Read Similar Stories

Opinion

OPINION: Advancing the monitoring of space weather events

February 26, 20255 Mins Read
Opinion

OPINION: Are weather forecasts better with artificial intelligence?

July 10, 20244 Mins Read
Opinion

OPINION: Extreme weather phenomena and climate change require preparedness and risk management

April 4, 20244 Mins Read
Latest News

WMO and Beijing Climate Centre host climate monitoring and prediction forum in Qingdao

May 16, 2025

Integrated model improves flood risk assessment in China

May 15, 2025

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Ramla Qureshi, McMaster University’s Department of Civil Engineering

May 14, 2025

Receive breaking stories and features in your inbox each week, for free


Enter your email address:


Supplier Spotlights
  • REMTECH
Latest Job Postings
  • Researcher/Engineer to support data-based weather forecasting (R2/RE2)

    • Barcelona
    • Barcelona Supercomputing Center - Centro Nacional de Supercomputación
    • Full Time
Getting in Touch
  • Contact Us / Advertise
  • Meet the Editors
  • Download Media Pack
  • Free Weekly E-Newsletter
Our Social Channels
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
© 2025 UKi Media & Events a division of UKIP Media & Events Ltd
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Notice and Takedown Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the ...
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.

CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Functional

Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

Performance

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Analytics

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Advertisement

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.

Others

Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by