Close Menu
Meteorological Technology International
  • News
    • A-E
      • Agriculture
      • Automated Weather Stations
      • Aviation
      • Climate Measurement
      • Data
      • Developing Countries
      • Digital Applications
      • Early Warning Systems
      • Extreme Weather
    • G-P
      • Hydrology
      • Lidar
      • Lightning Detection
      • New Appointments
      • Nowcasting
      • Numerical Weather Prediction
      • Polar Weather
    • R-S
      • Radar
      • Rainfall
      • Remote Sensing
      • Renewable Energy
      • Satellites
      • Solar
      • Space Weather
      • Supercomputers
    • T-Z
      • Training
      • Transport
      • Weather Instruments
      • Wind
      • World Meteorological Organization
      • Meteorological Technology World Expo
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    • January 2026
    • April 2025
    • January 2025
    • September 2024
    • April 2024
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Expo
LinkedIn X (Twitter) Facebook
  • Sign-up for Free Weekly E-Newsletter
  • Meet the Editors
  • Contact Us
  • Media Pack
LinkedIn Facebook
Subscribe
Meteorological Technology International
  • News
      • Agriculture
      • Automated Weather Stations
      • Aviation
      • Climate Measurement
      • Data
      • Developing Countries
      • Digital Applications
      • Early Warning Systems
      • Extreme Weather
      • Hydrology
      • Lidar
      • Lightning Detection
      • New Appointments
      • Nowcasting
      • Numerical Weather Prediction
      • Polar Weather
      • Radar
      • Rainfall
      • Remote Sensing
      • Renewable Energy
      • Satellites
      • Solar
      • Space Weather
      • Supercomputers
      • Training
      • Transport
      • Weather Instruments
      • Wind
      • World Meteorological Organization
      • Meteorological Technology World Expo
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    1. January 2026
    2. September 2025
    3. April 2025
    4. January 2025
    5. September 2024
    6. April 2024
    7. January 2024
    8. September 2023
    9. April 2023
    10. Archive Issues
    11. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    November 27, 2025

    In this Issue – January 2026

    By Hazel KingNovember 27, 2025
    Recent

    In this Issue – January 2026

    November 27, 2025

    In this Issue – September 2025

    August 11, 2025

    In this Issue – April 2025

    April 15, 2025
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Expo
Facebook LinkedIn
Subscribe
Meteorological Technology International
Climate Measurement

NASA-funded network tracks the rise and fall of ozone pollutants  

Lawrence ButcherBy Lawrence ButcherFebruary 19, 20214 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
Share
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email

A short-lived resurgence in the emission of ozone-depleting pollutants in Eastern China will not significantly delay the recovery of Earth’s protective ‘sunscreen’ layer, according to new research published in Nature.

NASA computer models helped scientists identify an uptick in atmospheric emissions of an ozone-depleting gas called CFC-11. NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) work together as part of a long-running research partnership to monitor emissions of stratospheric ozone and to support ozone scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of Bristol.

In 1987, the Montreal Protocol – an international treaty enacted to protect the ozone layer from additional degradation – banned new production and trade of ozone-depleting substances like CFC-11, and 198 nations have since signed on to the agreement.

After production ceased, scientists still expected CFC-11 to continue leaking over the years from existing products, but at a gradually declining rate. Because of this, the gas is among those monitored at the global scale by NOAA’s Global Monitoring Division and the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) – a network of monitoring stations funded by NASA and several environmental agencies, and headed by the Center for Global Change Science at MIT and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

In 2018, NOAA first reported a smaller decrease in the decline of atmospheric CFC-11 than expected. The numbers didn’t align with trajectories based on CFC-11’s production ban, hinting that something had changed. “The slow-down in the rate of decline indicated that somebody was emitting again, or in larger quantities than we were expecting, we just didn’t know where,” noted Matt Rigby, a University of Bristol (UK) scientist and one of the lead authors of the new study.

It was the AGAGE network that helped track down the origins of much of the new emission of CFC-11 thanks to its geographic distribution. Two of its stations, the South Korean Gosan AGAGE station, run by Kyungpook National University in South Korea, and the AGAGE-affiliated station on Hateruma Island in Japan, run by Japan’s National Institute For Environmental Studies, were both positioned close enough to the source for researchers to track much of the new emissions back to their source: Eastern China.

“This is very much like detective work,” said Qing Liang, a research scientist at NASA Goddard’s Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and co-author of the study. “We figured out there was a problem, then we tracked down where the problem was regionally, and it seems that the actions taken in China, and perhaps elsewhere, have resulted in a big drop in the unexpected emissions [since 2018].”

Due in large part to effective monitoring, and subsequent reaction to the 2018 report, data and analysis in these two papers (published in February 2021) suggest that both the renewed Eastern Chinese and overall global emissions of CFC-11 after mandated global phase out in 2010, have returned to previous levels.

The observed levels of increased emission were comparable to the carbon dioxide emissions of a city roughly the size of London. In other words, closing off CFC-11 emissions has an additional climate benefit similar to that of shutting off a megacity.

Despite the monitoring success story, some emissions are still unaccounted for – and scientists have been unable to pinpoint where they are coming from due to current limitations of the monitoring network.

“The one critical piece of information we need is atmospheric observations,” added Liang. “That’s the reason why it is really important for NASA and NOAA, together with their international partners, to continue making measurements of these gases.”

Monitoring networks like the AGAGE stations are a valuable tool for understanding the role atmospheric chemistry plays in our changing climate.

Previous ArticleGlobal Climate Observing System Status Report open for review
Next Article Reading University meteorologists contribute to new ‘green economy’ research

Read Similar Stories

Data

Atmospheric G2 secures Japan weather forecasting license

April 21, 20262 Mins Read
Climate Measurement

China completes Antarctic meteorological research mission with Xuelong icebreaker

April 21, 20262 Mins Read
Radar

EWR Radar Systems wins US Air Force contract for portable Doppler radar support

April 20, 20262 Mins Read
Latest News

Extreme heat posing significant risks to ecosystems and agriculture, FAO-WMO report warns

April 22, 2026

Atmospheric G2 secures Japan weather forecasting license

April 21, 2026

China completes Antarctic meteorological research mission with Xuelong icebreaker

April 21, 2026

Receive breaking stories and features in your inbox each week, for free


Enter your email address:


Supplier Spotlights
  • EWR Radar Systems
Getting in Touch
  • Contact Us / Advertise
  • Meet the Editors
  • Media Pack
  • Free Weekly E-Newsletter
Our Social Channels
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
© 2026 UKi Media & Events a division of UKIP Media & Events Ltd
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Notice and Takedown Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.